Last weekend I attended a Compassionate Presence workshop. Like any community, we yogis share particular
worldviews and practices that can be outside the mainstream. Reconnecting with others who don’t think it
is crazy to chant in Sanskrit even if we don’t know what the words mean, who
have serious talks about breathing and loving-kindness, and who believe truly,
madly, and deeply that all beings are linked to a Divine presence, is a way to
reinforce our individual practices. Compassion is definitely yogi territory,
and I was eager to find ways to bring it off the mat and into my other social
worlds.
Not so fast. After
some chanting (see above) and introductions, we took a quiz on compassion. Many of the questions were difficult to
answer, as often happens on these kinds of quizzes, because there is no room
for context. For example, one of the
statements was, “When friends are sick, I make a point of paying them a
visit.” Because I don’t necessarily want
visitors when I’m sick, I figure that my friends don’t either, unless there is
something specific I can provide for them. I will also admit to discomfort in being
around people who are physically suffering.
Any response feels either inadequate or wrong. That probably comes from wanting to fix the
situation, and since the Dr. before my name is not the M.D. kind, I feel
incapable of doing anything substantive for their health.
Another statement was, “I drop everything to help my
neighbors and coworkers when they are having problems.” Again, I go back to my empathetic
response. I would feel terribly guilty
if an acquaintance rearranged her schedule because I was having some kind of
nebulous “problem.” The only person I
expect to do that for me is my husband, and since we go back 19 years, that
seems like a fair expectation. That
being said, if my neighbor needs me to take her son to school, I’m happy to do
it unless I happen to be teaching a class or have a meeting at that time. To me, the “drop everything” is a red flag. It is disrespectful of one’s own time, life,
and plans.
It is probably obvious why I scored five points under Low Giver (20th
percentile), which is where they stopped counting. What would be the name of the percentile
under that? Stingy Giver? I
have not scored that low on a test since the quantitative section of the
GRE. Thank goodness that test had verbal
and reasoning sections, or I never would have gotten into grad school.
Just as the GRE measures different kinds of intelligence,
shouldn’t a compassion quiz address multiple types of compassion? For example, if there were questions about
animals (“I have adopted animals from a shelter,” or “I send a little prayer
for the souls of roadkill when I pass their furry bodies by the side of the
road” for example), my score might be a lot higher. Or, if there were questions for listening to
friends and family members who are frustrated by circumstances or people
outside their control, my score might at least hover in the “Low Giver” range.
On the other hand, this quiz provided some insight into my
willingness to offer and express compassion.
It is easy for me to feel compassion for those who have little power,
whether they are Michael Vick’s pit bulls, abandoned children, or targets of
domestic, political, or societal violence.
It is harder to feel compassion for grownups who make self-harming
choices or who cede their sense of well-being and control to others and then
complain about it (full disclosure—that’s one of my specialties. Damn it!).
While most of us—saints and gurus aside—are guilty of the
above, Charles Eisenstein offers this wisdom: “I would surely do
as you do, if I were you.” This is
beyond empathy, which simply makes a claim about understanding how the other
feels. It is easy to feel horror and sadness for victims, but most of us would like
to think that we would not have remained in the abusive relationship; would not
become addicted to food, drugs, or alcohol; and most certainly would not have
slapped a child. Eisenstein says that
true compassion starts with understanding that if you were that person in those
circumstances, yes, you would have
done those things. It does not make
everything okay; and it does not excuse behaviors that harm the self or
others. Compassion is the simple
recognition that, as Lucille Clifton said, “Every pair of eyes facing you has
probably experienced something you could not endure.”
Thus, compassion is not about being nice. It is about being authentic and accepting the
world and people as they are—not as we want them to be. Compassion also tells us we are all the same,
deep down. It is about offering what we
can out of the kindness that naturally arises when we come from a place of
identification instead of judgment, because judgment arises from a sense of I’m-better-than-you,
thus I can fix this for you.
Deborah Adele writes, “Handling challenges gives each of us
a sense of skill, self-esteem, and accomplishment. When we try to fix or save someone else, we are
keeping them from getting the learning the situation has for them.” That’s my lesson from flunking the quiz. I may not able to cure you or fix your
situation, but watch out the next time you get sick. I might be stopping by anyway.
Great post Janet. Gave me much to think about in my own world!! And, as always, made me laugh. :)
ReplyDeleteA beautiful post, Janet. (So, the accountability movement has invaded even the yogi community?)
ReplyDelete