My sister-in-law likes to play the Desert Island game. We are given a category, such as fruit, and
asked to give the top five that we would want if we were stranded on a Desert
Island. The Island motif serves as a
metaphor for the things you couldn’t live without if you had to choose. Notwithstanding that many folks actually live
on real versions of a Desert Island, with their choices conscripted by their
social, psychological, economic, and/or cultural circumstances, it’s worth
thinking about what really matters in a world where Dennis Rodman in North
Korea makes the front page, and I have to read about the war in Afghanistan in Doonesbury.
I never could answer those Desert Island questions because
there are too many contextualizing factors.
Take the fruit example. I would
probably pick clementines, but after that, the choice is less clear. If I picked apples, would they be the hard,
juicy kind that bite you back? I eat
blueberries in my oatmeal every day in summer, but what if I don’t have oatmeal
on the island? And of course I love
avocados, but they have a lot of fat.
And are they even a fruit?
So you see my dilemma.
Give me any Desert Island category, and I will not be able to come up with
a definitive list because of the range of variables. For example, with movies, I know I would get
sick of watching the same five over and over, so would I choose something that
requires multiple watchings to understand, as opposed to say, The Big Lebowski, which makes me laugh
and cringe at the same time?
Books are the same way.
I’d have to weigh fiction and nonfiction, philosophy and poetry, young
adult, popular fiction, literary fiction, books of theories and essays. Books
on yoga, books on meditation, books on compassion, books on spirituality. Books on social justice, books on schooling,
books on social justice in schools. Books on writing, books on teaching, books on
teaching writing. It is impossible to
choose.
And yet. I do
believe that I just read a book that covers almost all of the above. This book, only 50 pages long, provides a
framework for many of the issues I have been contemplating for the last 20
years or so.
Here’s a quote:
Spiritual people, by and
large, try to behave well, a habit I am not attempting to subvert. Still, living by some idea about how things
should be is not entirely preferable to living as you are. For one thing, the goodness of others can
have a shaming side, especially if the virtue has shallow roots. People who do not or cannot, yet, behave very
well may feel humiliated by spiritual language and behavior. They may feel they aren’t good enough to sit
at this table. Or they may suspect, with
reason, the quality of the food. (O’ Reilley, pp. 18-19).
I have suspected the quality of food at many a spiritual
table, even my own cooking. I wrote
rather lightheartedly last week about the obstacles of Ganesha, joking about
yoga poses that elude me and traffic on 195.
The next morning, I found out that the 15 year old son of a friend had
died in a tragic accident. I also
connected back to my friend’s father in the hospital, and another friend’s
partner dying in the VA Hospital. Screw
Ganesha, I thought.
And then, I remembered that I don’t actually believe that
an elephant god puts obstacles in my path to teach me lessons about humility,
patience, or anything else. It is up to
me to see the thing and behave in an authentic, thoughtful way, recognizing
that my negative reactions are patterns, not character flaws.
O’Reilley acknowledges the injustices of the world and how
it comes into our classrooms, whether we like it or not. She writes,
Life comes to dark places, and
people sit with stories that are truly hellacious….What does this have to do
with teaching school, you may wonder.
Well, I think that if we can’t pull the weight of these stories off
people, it’s very hard for them to learn.
Yes. This is the
real world of teaching, and yet there’s not a damn thing about it in the Common
Core or in any educational policy that I have ever seen.
I remember when, a few years after I graduated, I was
marveling to my advisor that I couldn’t understand her feedback on my
dissertation, and now it was crystal clear.
She said, “Janet, you couldn’t hear me then.”
Sometimes students can’t hear us, maybe because of the
stories they are carrying around. But
the wise teacher can at least make time to hear her/his students. That’s our job, even if it isn’t in in our
job descriptions or evaluations.
So my Desert Island list is pretty definitive after all:
clementines, The Big Lebowski, and a
tiny book called Radical Presence:
Teaching as Contemplative Practice by Mary Rose O’Reilley.